In which scenario would a simplified procedure be more likely to be utilized?

A simplified procedure is designed for cases that involve lower stakes and less complex legal issues, making it a good fit for minor contractual disputes. This procedure is intended to expedite the resolution of disputes that are straightforward in nature, allowing for a more efficient and cost-effective process.

In cases like a minor contractual dispute, the amount at stake is typically below the threshold set for the simplified procedure, which helps to promote accessibility and reduce the burden on the court system. The simplified procedure allows for fewer procedural requirements and potentially faster timelines, which align with the needs of parties involved in minor disputes.

In contrast, scenarios such as high-stakes business mergers, complex personal injury cases, and class action lawsuits usually involve significant legal complexities, larger amounts in contention, and intricate evidentiary issues. These factors necessitate a more formal procedure with additional procedural safeguards and detailed examination of evidence, rendering the simplified procedure inappropriate for those situations.